Basic GMing Rules

Rules of Game MasteringFrom Garry Stahl

1:  Garry’s First Rule of Fantasy

  1. Do not change reality more than necessary to make your universe work. Real world physics are your friend. You do not need to explain gravity, weather, or in general how the world functions. So don’t complicate things that do not need complication. Adding super science or magic is complication enough.
  2. All role-playing games are fantasy, even if it is not. Of course it’s fantasy. If it was real you would be living it, not playing it in a game.  Even the modern games or science fiction games are a fantasy.
  3. Fantasy is not an excuse for sloppy writing or world building.

Fantasy is not an excuse word that means you don’t have to do your homework or keep track of things.  Good fantasy is internally consistent.  We do wish to write a good fantasy.

And we do want good writing. When I was talking with Melissa Scott at ConFusion and her friends some years ago (2003) I mentioned running a D&D game for 27 years (at the time). Her eyes got as big as saucers and she said “That is writing too!”

So you have it from a pro, and a well-educated one.  Your RPG writing is writing. Treat your game with respect, take writing it seriously, and it will furnish you and your friends decades of enjoyment.

Last note, just don’t take yourself seriously.

2:  Write to Your Audience

Know your players. Ask what they like and what they want to see in the game. Vital: ASK. Don’t assume. Poll the players, inquire and check things out. Their role in the game is as important as yours.

On that note, seek adventures of mutual enjoyment.  If you are a sea adventure bunny (like me) and your players are not (like mine), then don’t write sea adventures.  Write something you both like.  You are part of your own audience.  If you don’t like what you are doing it will show and enjoyment will be lessened.

Explore the limits, but be careful. Pushing the limits can be a good thing if you do not push them too far.  Push people’s limits too far and they get uncomfortable. Uncomfortable people are not having fun.  People that are not having fun stop coming. Don’t even go there if you do not know your players well.  It’s a game, not a psychological test.

3:  The Rule of Yes

  1. Unless there is a compelling reason to say no, say yes. Playing a game with Dr. No isn’t fun. Players want to have fun and do things. There is a time and place for obstacles. Learn and know that time and place. Trying to find a royal blue shirt or spell components in the market is not that time.
  2. A roll is not required for everything, even if a roll needed. Use judgment in applying the dice. Dice are random, random isn’t vital even if the rules say it is.  Remember the Rule of Yes.

4:  Keep Encounters Open Ended

  1. An encounter with one solution is bad. I do not write encounters with a solution in mind. I present the problem, and let the players tell me how it will be solved. Remember they are creative too. Use that.
  2. Frustrated players are bad. Look back to the Rule of Yes. If your players cannot solve something because you wrote in a single solution they didn’t think of, they get frustrated. This makes the GM look bad.
  3. Use any reasonable solution and be open to solutions you didn’t think of. As above, Rule of Yes and keep an open mind. You have one brain, your players have one each. Use the brains around you to improve the game.

5: Be Flexible

Don’t script. Players will do the unpredictable. And that is that. You want north they go south. You have the old gypsy with the legend, and they visit everyone but.  When that happens, punt.

If an encounter is important, it can be fit in elsewhere. Only you know how the scenario is assembled. No one will smite you if you shuffle the parts. If the Vicar has the legend and not the Gypsy you don’t lose GMing points.

Most Important, have fun. The game is played for fun. If everyone is having fun, you are a successful GM.

Comments

  1. MaxCarrion says

    De ja vu, I swear I’ve read this before. Still it’s good advice and I don’t think there’s a single thing there that I disagree with.

    • Miri says

      A lot of this is common advice, although Garry seems to put it much more succinctly and much less subtly than most people do. There is, however, a lot of stuff that I haven’t seen anywhere else, though, so it’s possible you saw him somewhere else.

  2. says

    Well said. I especially advocate not writing solutions.

    We had an especially fun session a while back in my previous HackMaster campaign. The PCs were investigating a theft but when the session started not even I knew the thief’s identity. I simply made up logical responses as the party investigated the scene and interviewed witnesses. I figured out the thief’s identity about a minute before the players did. The best part is that they had no idea that I was running it quite that open-ended until I told them afterwards.

    So yes, we’re huge fans of scenarios with no planned ending.