Campaign Level Thinking

by Mourngrymn

(reposted with permission from Strolen’s Citadel)

How do you run a high level campaign? While this is a simple question it is not simple to answer. Anyone who is an experienced DM will tell you that, especially for beginner DMs. To answer this I began thinking backwards. Not about running a high level campaign, but how do you get there? How do you run a successful low level campaign?

While different, I think it all ties together in the end as you can’t have one without the other.

Can your high level campaign survive or even exist without a good low level campaign? In my opinion, no. Can your low level campaign exist without a defined purpose for a high level campaign to follow? Again, in my opinion, no.

This is not a set of rules for everyone I can assure you, and while they are not rules and more like guidelines, they still can be viewed in many different ways and this is more for a generalized outlook of how to do things.

Low Level

What defines a low level group or campaign? Well, a beginner’s campaign for starters, a group who is supposedly fresh, virulent, and unknowing of the dangers of the world. This group of beginners is just that, beginners. They are young in the sense they know little of their world, intrigue or dangers. They could have knowledge, but firsthand knowledge is always different. That’s why some games have characters roll a Horror factor or a fear factor roll every time they see a new creature to see if it disturbs them. A perfect idea if you ask me.

The low level campaign is where I begin fleshing out the characters. Getting future plot hooks from their backgrounds and their actions. This sets up the story I already have and adds a heart beat to it. This is how I begin a new campaign. I get an idea in my head where I want to start and end. I get with the players and gather as much information on their characters as possible and then build off of that. The beginning few levels I use to build those characters.

A low level campaign, in my opinion, should not extend the boundaries of a certain area. A kingdom is a fine place to keep these borders closed, but I usually try to keep them tighter, possibly even restricted to a set of cities or villages and town to a number of days travel from the center of their starting point. This gives these beginners a base of operations to begin, fall back to, and return to lick their wounds and cry their laurels.

To get an idea of this, do a little research on how much travel was done in the Middle Ages. Commoners were usually bound to their homes and rarely traveled more than 10 miles from their homes their entire lives. Nobles and soldiers had the ability or the orders to travel farther than a normal commoner but it was still restricted and slow going. Most of us now have the ability to travel faster than 55 miles and hour, around the same time frame or technological era that I am referring to, you needed a very fast horse to travel the same distance in two or three days. This is why I restrict the boundaries of my low level playing field.

A low level campaign is more about the lives of individuals, the lives of those in towns and villages or perhaps even the life of a village or small town. It should rarely encompass something larger than the group as a whole could handle.

Ways to keep this low level campaign form getting out of hand.

1) Do not give out more experience than absolutely needed. (GM required rule only)

Sure, we all like to reward our players for their actions and conflict. Reward them with other items other than experience. Not magic per say, but reward them with items of worth that they can physically see. Grant them small titles of accomplishments. Grant them audiences with nobility. Grant them deeds to buildings, artwork, favors perhaps, anything that instills reward and a desire to continue but not one that bespeaks of, “All I have to do is show up and I gain a level.” Bad form I think. There are multiple submissions about what and when to reward characters and players on the site. Read them and love them they are a DM’s friend, especially if your new to the game.

2) Difficult Objectives are a must.

Yes, the more difficult the better. The group needs to look at something, an encounter, an adventure hook, or a plot and say to themselves, “Can we really complete this and survive?” Nothing in any handbook or any manual says that every single conflict must be winnable by the players. Humility must be a part of a player’s resume I think. If they sweep through every obstacle they are given then how are they going to take loss? Not very good I think. Players will get upset and possibly leave. Who knows what could happen. The point being is that a GM should throw a task so difficult at the players at times that it makes them sit back and wonder what went wrong, how can it be fixed? Anything that evokes a response.

The best example of this just recently happened to me and the group I play in.

We are coming off a high level campaign. After five years of me playing the same character and six total years playing a total of three characters, this campaign finally came to an end. And what an end it was. My high level cleric was able to do many things that only a high level cleric could aspire to.

When we rolled up new characters for a whole new campaign, some of us had forgotten what low level was like. How difficult it was at times. Well our entire group of ten was whittled down to two in a single combat in a span of two melee rounds. That woke us up real quick. Lucky for me I was one of the two. We then realized we had to step back and take a new outlook on how to run and play a low level character.

It should be impossible for a low level group to complete and surpass every objective they come across. Sure, the group are supposed to be the cream of the crop of their world, hence why they are adventurers (No one would want to play a peasant, although Palladium has rules for rolling up peasants and scribes.), but they should not be able to muscle their way through everything.

Which brings me to another point of rewards.

3) Keeping rewards down.

I know I was speaking of rewards earlier and how we can help fix some of the, too much experience problem by giving out other things. At low level, granting rewards such as experience and too much coinage is a failure of a campaign. To much experience to a low level campaign bull rushes the characters too fast into the world. Similar to mind of high school kids who get drafted into the NFL because they are “SO GOOD!” If you think about the similarities here it’s scary.

Take a football (American Football) player out of high school. He is good yes, for a high school player. But recruiters are always out to make a name and they draft this young 18 year old kid to play in the NFL, a place where the average age is mid to late twenties. The skill and knowledge learned within that six year difference is astounding. This high school kid doesn’t know how the real game is played. The real rules, the real hardships, the real hits, nothing is learned so nothing is gained.

Now, take a first level character who is given so much experience within the first few times they are played that they bump a level or two. The same thing happens to them as the high school football player. They do not understand the strife and the skill needed to get there, basically being spoon fed. They don’t understand or know what the real monsters of the world are and can do. And anyone portraying someone with that knowledge is doing so wrongly in my opinion. Player knowledge and character knowledge should always be separate, but that is me.

Mid Level Campaign

The definition of a mid level campaign for me is just a joining point between the low and high level campaign. It is a time to break away from stories and plot lines and get into world fluff.

A mid level campaign for me is a continuation of the low level campaign. We have already established the characters and their ticks, their flaws, their habits, and most of all their plot hooks. By the time a character hits mid level I try to have at least three distinct plot hooks for each individual. This may seem like a lot, especially when running with five or more players, but it gives a lot of room to work with for drama and reoccurring problems and villains.

Where in a low level campaign it is the lives of the individual that are important, now it is the lives of cities and large groups of people. Perhaps small armies are now important but still nothing larger than the importance of a few cities involved. Perhaps the reign of a noble, which in the long run and high level campaign could affect a kingdom. This is a good way to lead into the larger plots, the larger picture. But again, it is a mid level campaign and the group should not take on something they can not handle themselves.

Once a character reaches this point, they know what their strengths and weaknesses are. They know strife, and have struggled with loss and probably death depending on the game system. I usually use this time to allow the players to roam and tie up loose ends that may have transpired during their low level campaign.

That is it for this level of detail, not much to it. At least, not much that I put to it that is. It more closely resembles a open forum or talk group. I think of the companions from the original Dragonlance novels. They begin after leaving each other for five years to tie up loose ends. Hence, they left their low level campaign to enter their mid level campaign and agreed to get back together for their high level campaign. A bit of a cut and dry example of a book series but it worked for me.

Once again however, do not threaten all that is worked for by throwing out to much experience so the mid level range is passed by too quickly.

High Level Campaign

A high level campaign for me is special. It follows few major steps that are important. No longer should the plots be simple. No more point A to point B type of search or hunt. The high level campaign was built on a massive scale. No longer are the lives of individuals involved, but the health and the life of kingdoms.

By kingdoms I mean a mass scale involvement of the lands. Involvement of multiple kingdoms, mass hordes of creatures, demons, or other beings sweeping through the lands of the populated and wiping out everything. Everything is on a mass scale. All of this is left up to interpretation of course but you must think on a much grander scale when dealing with high end campaigns. Battles should seldom exist as a one on one instance unless it is with a highly powerful enemy or being. Combat should be on a mass scale to show the growth of the character. Sure, some would ask, “What is the point of raising a character up to a high level if they are not going to fight anymore?” I didn’t say that.

The characters will still fight. But they will fight larger opponents. Forget dragons, as unless you have some weak Pern dragon that exists on your world, a real dragon should be too powerful for a single person no matter their experience. I had some friends that played Dangerous Journeys once and they told me of a fight with a single dragon that was true to what it SHOULD be. It was a group of five high level characters who hired a literal army and twelve stone giants as support. Three characters and one giant survived but in the end they succeeded. That is a high level conflict and how a dragon should really be done. No one shot death kind of encounter. But I digress.

The characters will still fight. Mix it up. Our high level campaign consisted of us fighting off hordes of low level creatures. A group of ten of us was fighting an entire tribe of goblins. They could still beat us easily because of numbers, but due to good planning and well timed attacks we succeeded. Also, we fought servants of gods, not gods themselves. Anything that can kill you even at high level is important. I have gone off on a tangent from my original though so I will try to back track to it.

When characters reach high levels they are no longer responsible for themselves but for others as well. Followers, hirelings, henchmen, retainers, you name it they should have it. Whether they are in command of an army or a lord of a manse, they have responsibilities that they need to protect.

So think about a campaign before it even starts. Think of the end game. Think of how it will begin, and where it will end. Because it will end regardless of what we desire as no character can live forever, death takes its charge eventually.

Mike Bourke

I have a somewhat different approach, with the things you’ve mentioned as secondary objectives. For me, low-level campaign is all about establishing the “rules” of the game world and campaign, the central concepts that make this campaign different from the last one that I ran and from the others that I am already running. Mid-level is when I bring in the major plotline of the campaign, constructed from the relationships and building blocks established in the low-level campaign. High-level is when the major plots are resolved – unless the intent is to run into epic levels, in which case high-level is there to offer reversals and up the ante before the epic conclusion.

Comments are closed