RPT#243 – Bad Gamemasters I Have Known And Loved: Part II, The Favoring GM
A Brief Word From Johnn
Funny RPG Simulator
I’ve been running Progress Quest on my machine this past week and it’s a hoot. It pokes fun at RPGs by letting you make a character and then running it through various quests on auto-pilot. Currently, my PC is level 48 and his favourite spells are Angioplasty VII, Big Sister XXII, and Mulligan XXXI. Check it out for yourself:
Yahoo Group For This Week’s Article
This week features more advice from Scott Zaboem on identifying and fixing GM weaknesses. He’s offered to write more articles on this topic, which is great news! And, he’d like to invite Roleplaying Tips readers over to his Yahoo! Group to specifically discuss bad GMs and to share anecdotes of past experiences to help him flesh out the bad GMing topics he’s got planned. The URL is:
Boo! I hope everyone had a great Halloween. Be sure to scare up a fun game this week!
NEW Sci-Fi Gaming Terrain Available NOW!
*** Free 64 oz. Gamer Mug with purchase! ***
* ALSO, Message Boards, Photo Galleries and News
Bad Gamemasters I Have Known And Loved: Part II, The Favoring GM
A guest article by S. G. Zaboem
Remember: every bad gamemaster is a good gamemaster with a few select bad habits.
- Examples of Favoring GMsOne of the most blatant examples of GM favoritism involves myself. I admit that I am a bad gamemaster. In one case, I asked my girlfriend to try joining my campaign. She agreed only on the condition that she play as a fairy with a magic wand that creates flowers on everything it touches. Because my girlfriend was _so_ fond of fairies, I also knew that any harm coming to this character would result in even more harm to me.
So, I announced to my regular players that my girlfriend would be sitting in with us and that I did intend to perform blatant acts of favoritism. My girlfriend brought to the table a character I converted myself but which violated numerous character creation rules. In a Rifts: New West setting she was playing a Silver Bell fairy with a rune wand and immunity to all harm, plus regular fairy magic. She seemed to have fun, and the other players accepted the situation. She quit after that one session, however, and claimed personality differences with the other players. The players immediately afterward decided to rotate me out of the GM’s chair.
Another example of favoritism occurred near the same time. I once played in a very short Dungeons and Dragons 3rd edition game in which a guy named Odin ran me and another player through a dungeon module. Odin sent an NPC with us who was a twentieth level everything – yes, everything. The NPC was actually King Arthur suffering from a case of multiple personality disorder. Basically, Arthur cut through the dungeon while our single class, first level characters followed him and watched.
And now for something completely different. My first experience with a tabletop roleplaying was in college when I observed a gaming group for a sociology paper. Following that, I became a player in a Robotech RPG game run by a fellow named James. It was an interesting game in which conspirators from Australia took over the earth with psionic Zwarth mecha, and an NPC smoked the Flower of Life, but it had huge problems with mechanics.
James’ game, had it been my first roleplaying experience, probably would convinced me to quit then. James earned the title of worst single gamemaster I have ever seen; he transcends normal classification, and crosses into almost every category of bad GM I have identified. Then he stole my books.
One of James’ most bizarre habits was his favoritism. James had a thing for swords. He was convinced that a sword was an infinitely superior weapon to a gun. Whenever battle erupted, the character with the sword always attacked first. If I had a rifle prepped and pointed at the opponent, the guy with the pointy stick could draw his weapon, close the distance across a battlefield, and strike me before I could get off a shot. What is particularly strange was that he was running Palladium Book’s Robotech RPG, a game in which swords aren’t even listed in the equipment section and mostly unavailable. Feasibility issues aside, James’ swords point to another clear cut case of favoritism.
- Analysis of the Favoring GMFavoritism is a complicated issue. Like most bad gamemasters, a favoring GM is usually well-meaning and sometimes unaware of a problem. There are many different forms of GM favoritism. Some amount of GM favoritism is to be found in any campaign, but blatant favoritism causes resentment in most players.
The most obvious and disliked form of GM favoritism is favoring one player or player character over another. This is what I did with my girlfriend and her character. At least I performed a wise act of damage control by announcing my attentions to the other players ahead of time. Some players will be accepting of this approach so long as the gamemaster is honest and upfront. Other players will resent favoritism regardless. Most of us fall somewhere between these two reactions by harboring lesser amounts of aggravation.
There are many signs to be recognized if a gamemaster is playing favorites:
This may simply be one player in the group always getting the cool magic loot, excessive experience points, or apparent immortality. These things only bother players when they see their own characters (or characters of other players) treated differently in similar situations.
In contrast with the act of favoring a player over others, a gamemaster might favor a particular NPC over everyone else. Odin’s ultimate fighter/thief/magic user/cleric demonstrates this perfectly. In almost any campaign, the characters will be expected to encounter NPCs who are more experienced and powerful than themselves, but the super-NPCs don’t belong in the party.
Story Element Favoritism
Favoring a particular story element is a more subtle form of GM favoritism than favoring a player or character. My first gamemaster, James, has generously provided this article with the example of his favoring swords over guns to a ridiculous extreme. Some gamemasters favor a particular setting over others and remain there until well after the players are bored with it.
One of the classic scenarios of GM favoritism is magic vs. technology. In games in which these two elements are supposed to be balanced, many gamemasters still have one (most often magic) completely overpower the other.
The worst violation of player equality, however, is unequal face time. What should players do if they realize that they are always sidekicks of a central PC hero? In the case of the Gearkreig RPG, one of the character templates is “Sidekick” and such a character should be expected to allow other players more limelight from time to time. Even a sidekick, however, should have some fun.
If the gamemaster directs the majority of his words to a single player, the slighted players will soon begin to feel that they are wasting their time. There will always be situations in which one character will dominate a part of a campaign, but if the trend lasts for more than a single game session, then the favored PC is begging for an assassination.
Consider how my friend, who will not be named, responded to his exposure to GM favoritism. Here is what he wrote to me: “(I resent) ignoring what players are saying until after a matter is resolved. I have personally and book-legally sacked and destroyed many a game for being overlooked when everyone else got their say and chance to act. Most players will complain after being ignored for four hours after a game, some will make sure they are never forgotten again.”
My friend, by the way, has honed his campaign breaking skills since writing these words. He now works a second job as a freelance campaign assassin. Disgruntled players actually hire him to infiltrate gaming groups, kill player characters, wreck settings, and make it all look like someone else’s fault. I know the Campaign Assassin, so don’t push me. 😉
- Speak Up AgainMost bad gamemasters don’t realize they are creating a problem but merely see the players getting more and more aggravated. Approach your gamemaster at a convenient time apart from the regular game sessions. Prepare a list of grievances (which you may call “concerns” for diplomacy) and specific examples of when you thought that he displayed unfair favoritism. Perhaps the GM has a legitimate reason for these actions – like setting up the favored player character for a fall.
Encourage the other players to speak with the gamemaster about their concerns. Do not, however, approach the gamemaster together as if performing an intervention or lynch mobbing. One on one conversations will likely be more productive anyway. If no one is able to get through, tie the gamemaster to a chair and perform an intervention anyway. 🙂
- Jump InIf one player is receiving all of the attention, it may be because the GM’s style differs from the gaming group’s style. Not every GM will ask, “What are you doing?” Instead, your gamemaster might be waiting for you to declare an action!
- Try it His WaySometimes, it’s better to join the darkness than fight against it. If your gamemaster has a hang up with swords, ask about learning to use a sword. If your gamemaster is firm set to his belief that magic spells can bring down a technology-produced force field, but technology is useless against a magic force field, ask about a *magical* power source for your laser rifle. You might like it better his way. In a worst case scenario, you still wouldn’t be having less fun than before you sold your soul to the GM for a magic sword.
- Hire the Campaign AssassinHis fee begins at fifty U.S. dollars (plus expenses) for most quick convention kills. Complex assignments will cost more; but he is willing to negotiate on price for particularly deserving targets. I am his contact for the southeastern region! 😉
Readers’ Tips Of The Week:
- Creating Campaign Politics
From: Joachim de Ravenbel (aka J.M. Bravo)In order to launch a political campaign, I have designed the following guidelines:
- Make a list of all the groups involved, then order then from the lowest to the highest in terms of power and influence. This will yield something like:
- Tailor Gralg
- “Lord” Surl
- Merchant Hustor
- Lord Waser
- Lord Trend
- Master Ornhild
- Lord Leril
- Lady Minst
- High Inquisitor Korn
- King Morin
- Assign each group a Political Rating (PR) as follows:
- First: 1 point
- Second: 1+2 points
- Third: 1+2+3 points
- Ninth: 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 points
- Tenth: 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10 points
In fact, each group has his order in points over the preceding one, or for those more versed in maths, n-th group = n*(n+1)/2. In our example, this gives:
- Tailor Gralg 1 pt
- “Lord” Surl 3 pts
- Merchant Hustor 6 pts
- Lord Waser 10 pts
- Lord Trend 15 pts
- Master Ornhild 21 pts
- Lord Leril 28 pts
- Lady Minst 36 pts
- High Inquisitor Korn 45 pts
- King Morin 55 pts
Or, you could rule that some groups are much closer than that, but it will somehow tend to that in the future (see point 8).
As far as I understand it, politics is being played by someone lower in the scale trying to discredit someone higher. There are several means to achieve that, and each method yields a number of additional points to the winner, the same amount being subtracted from the loser.
- One point discredit
Each of the following kinds of discredit gives the winner 1 point and the loser 1 point less:
- Slight insult. A makes a joking comment about B in a political meeting where B is not attending. “If lord Trend negotiates with the Boldans with the same efficiency he married his daughter, we must begin to fortify the city, my friend.”
A must make an easy check (Intelligence, Etiquette, Innuendo, Social…) to receive the point B will lose. Should A fail his check, it either means that nobody understood the insult or that someone came to the rescue of B: “Yes, but if the mortar is as thick as your wine, a fly could knock the wall down….” In that case, B wins (unknowingly) a point and A loses it.
- Minor incapacity. A puts one of B’s minions out of the way and replaces her by one of his group. The minion should not be harmed but only neutralised temporarily. For example, A puts a sleeping draught in the wine of B’s bard who falls before his performance for the King. Luckily, A had her own singer handy. A must make a check (whatever suitable). If he fails, the plot is discovered and B gains the point (and A loses). This can induce investigation. Should A’s culpability be ascertained, he loses 2 points but B gains nothing as he will still be laughed at for falling.
- Two points discredit
- Open insult. A insults B in a political group where B is present but unable to find a suitable answer. A and B must make opposition checks (whatever significant), but B suffers a penalty (say -4). Should B win, he will gain 2 points and A loses two points. “Master Ornhild, this magnificent cape of black silk surely reflects the mood of your son awaiting his betrothal, yes?”
- Major incapacity/Duel. Same as above, but the incapacitated victim is more than a mere minion of B.
- Financial coup. A manages to make B lose a lot of money, either by making a contract superseding B’s, or by destroying B’s goods. Either way, a check should occur with B at a penalty.
- Minor neutralisation. As Minor incapacity above except that B’s minion is killed, maimed, or made to flee the area.
- Three points discredit
- Head incapacity/Duel. Same as Major Incapacity, but the incapacitated victim is the head of group B.
- Major neutralisation. Same as Minor neutralisation, but the killed/maimed/exiled victim is more than a mere minion of B.
Alliances are powerful possibilities for gaining PR. A and B temporarily make an AB group with the PR of the higher group added to half the PR of the lowest one. This alliance will stay until either A or B makes a hostile movement toward the other, in which case the PRs are split according to an opposition check. Use the following table to split the PR:
Checks A B PR A PR B ---------------------------------------------------------- failed OK 1 AB-1 OK failed AB-1 1 OK OK PR*SMA/(SMA+SMB) PR*SMB/(SMA+SMB) failed failed retry retry SM: Success margin (result - difficulty)
- How to handle politics in game: the political turn.
Depending on your setting, you should decide on the length of the political turn. A week might be a good period, while in some cases you could use one day or one month in a high/low political land.At the beginning of each turn, roll randomly for A, B, and the event. Should A and B be in the same group, it means that the group splits into Aa and Ab unless the event is an alliance, in which case either re-roll or ignore.
Political Event Table --------------------- 1d10 Event 1 Slight insult (1pt) 2 Minor incapacity (1pt) 3 Open insult (2pts) 4 Major incapacity (2pts) 5 Minor neutralisation/Duel (2pts) 6 Financial coup (2pts) 7 Head incapacity (3pts) 8 Major neutralisation/Duel (3pts) 9 Roll twice 10 Roll thrice, ignore, or reroll (your choice).
Well that’s it. I welcome any additions to the event chart and hope that this might be useful.
- PC Motivations
From: Dr. Nik
http://www.sponng.comThe three big motivations for any conflict:
Blood = Family, Relation, Mentor, Slave/Master, etc.
Money = Paid to do it, wants money or power, etc.
Pledge = Honor, Vengeance, Oath, Religion, etc.
Using these as a base, you can come up with unique secrets and reasons for character motivations.
- DMs Needing Cheap Miniatures?
From: Joe YergerSomething I have found to be useful is the Dollar Store. You can buy bags of 50-100 army men of various colors or types for $1-2 and sometimes animals for those pesky Druids in the party (or, in my case, a Druid/Shifter). The men work great for those situations when you have a large number of “goons” or generic people involved with the characters. Different colors help you keep track of the different kinds of “goons”. Green could be “commoners”, Blue could be “cops”, Beige/White could be “aristocrats”, Red could be shopkeepers.
The animals are great because it is nearly impossible to find good animal miniatures.
Advice: If you decide to use these kind of miniatures, try gluing them to standard size poker chips for large creatures, and smaller chips for medium size.
I have a nice, cheap solution to your battlemat problems that everyone runs into. You can take a battlemat, either purchased or homemade, to an office shop like Kinko’s, and have them laminate it with the second width they offer. It cost me about $9.00 and now we have a battlemat that you can write on with Dry-Erase markers.
I have found, however, that black markers work the best. They come off easier. Red doesn’t work at all. Black “Expo” brand markers work the best out of all I have tried.
Thanks for the E-Zine.
- Online D&D 3E PC Sheets
From: Jeffrey JelmelandHere is one that I use: http://www.3edb.com/
The Roleplaying Tips GM Encyclopedia
BEST GAME AID – Gold Gen Con ENnie Winner 2004
Need advice fast? Inbox full? Hard Drive crashed?
Missing valuable Roleplaying Tips issues? Fear not!
4 years, 200 issues, 2200+ tips, all sorted for you
by Issue#, Tip Topic, Type Of Tip, and more.
For information, screen shots, and ordering info click here:
In an upcoming issue, I’d like to discuss the best ideas for handling split parties. What can a GM do when three characters decide to go left, and two go right?
- What do you do when this happens?
- What GMing practices and techniques have worked well for you?
- What things have you tried that did not work well?